... and says what he feels to be the truth, RIGHT on the air and RIGHT in your face.
You know the story of the Benghazi attacks. Or at least part of it. You've heard about it in the news, right? If not, GOOGLE it.
And one network has been hyping it over and over and over again, even as the others have let the story go.
So when that network (Fox News) had an interview on Monday with an man who has covered the military for a long time, they probably had no idea he would basically dismiss them as a wing of hte Republican party (his words, not mine).
That interview ended rather abruptly on Monday after he took not one but two jabs at the network hosting him.
Co-anchor Jon Scott interviewed Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and
author Thomas Ricks, who has covered the military for decades, about
his new book The Generals. Scott asked Ricks weigh in on the attack on
the U.S. consulate in Benghazi and Sen. John McCain's criticisms of
Amb. Susan Rice.
"I think Benghazi was generally hyped by this network especially,"
Ricks said. He added that he thought McCain seemed to be "backing off"
from criticizing Rice since "the campaign [was] over."
"When you have four people dead for the first time in more than 30
years, how do you call that hype?" Scott said, pushing back against
Ricks' characterization of the network's coverage.
Ricks compared the situation to security contractors who were killed
in Iraq. He described the attack in Benghazi as a "small fire-fight" and
added, "I think the emphasis on Benghazi has been extremely political,
partly because Fox is operating as the wing of the Republican Party."
At that point, Scott thanked Ricks for his time and ended the interview after about 90 seconds.
UPDATE: According to the New York Times' Brian Stelter,
a Fox News staffer told Ricks he was rude following the interview.
Ricks said that he thinks the hit lasted "about half as long as
Watch it here: