Really?
But it's not what you think...
There is little a school can do to prevent a mass murderer from coming to its campus and killing people at will.
But when a gunman kills people, then stops and goes back to his dorm room, and the university does not tell anyone about it!!!, that is negligence (failing to do something legally required of you).
Here is the story:
A jury found Virginia Tech negligent on Wednesday for waiting to warn students about a gunman during a 2007 campus massacre that left 33 dead.
Jurors deliberated for 3 ½ hours before siding with the parents of two students who were killed on April 16, 2007, in the most deadly mass shooting in modern U.S. history. Their wrongful death civil lawsuit argued that lives could have been spared if school officials had moved more quickly to alert the campus after the first two victims were shot in a dorm. The massacre ended later in the morning with the deaths 31 more people, including the gunman, at a classroom building.
There it is, the key fact. The university did not warn people as it was required to do.
The state was the lone defendant in the case and argued that the university did all that it could with the information available at the time. President Charles W. Steger and other university officials have said they initially believed the first two shootings were isolated instances of domestic violence.
So perhaps this is why my university App State alerted people of a gunman on campus after a student supposedly walked in on a man stealing his TV (the whole thing was a hoax, making the lockdown look silly).
Here is the rest of the story:
The jury awarded $4 million each to the families of Erin Peterson and Julia Pryde, but the state immediately filed a motion to reduce the award. State law requires the award to be capped at $100,000.
"The university's contention has been all along, to quote president Steger 'We did everything we could do,'" said Robert T. Hall, an attorney for the parents. "Obviously the jury didn't buy that."
The verdict was met immediately by sobs from Peterson's mother, Celeste, while the Prydes didn't show much emotion.
"Today we got what we wanted," Celeste Peterson said afterward. "The truth is out there, and that's all we ever wanted. We came here for the truth."
Circuit Judge William Alexander said it was the hardest case he had been a part of.
"My heart goes out to all of you," he said to the families of victims.
Virginia Tech spokesman Mark Owczarski said after the verdict that the school would review the case with the attorney general before deciding on any further options.
"We are disappointed with today's decision and stand by our long-held position that the administration and law enforcement at Virginia Tech did their absolute best with the information available on April 16, 2007," a statement from Owczarski said.
One of the state's attorneys, Peter R. Messitt, said before the verdict that Tech officials could not be expected to anticipate the killing spree, calling the slaughter unprecedented "in the history of higher education" and "one of the most horrible days in America."
"What happened at Norris Hall was not reasonably foreseeable," he told jurors during closing arguments.
During the trial, the attorneys for the Prydes and Petersons portrayed campus police as leaping to the conclusion that the first two victims were shot by a jealous boyfriend, and that the gunman was not a threat to others.
They presented evidence that campus leaders, including Steger, heeded the police conclusion without question, then waited 2 1/2 hours before sending a campus-wide warning that a "shooting incident" had occurred. It did not say a gunman was still at large.
Police were pursuing the boyfriend of one of the dorm shooting victims as a "person of interest" at the expense of a campus-wide alert, the plaintiffs' attorneys said.
Police stopped the boyfriend as he approached the Blacksburg campus and were questioning him as shots rang out at Norris Hall, where student Seung-Hui Cho chained shut the doors to the building and killed the students and faculty. He then killed himself.
Tech officials issued a specific warning that a "gunman is loose on campus" through emails to 37,000 at 9:50 a.m., nearly 10 minutes after Cho began the Norris slaughter.
The parents' attorneys also accused Steger and other administrators of trying to cover up their missteps by building official timelines that suggested they reacted more aggressively to the first shootings. Tech administrators said mistakes in the timelines were made in the fog of a horrific tragedy.
The state presented witnesses, including experts in campus security, who said Tech police and administrators acted properly when they concluded the dorm shootings were domestic. The shootings occurred in an isolated area of the dorm, and the victims were a man and a woman clad in their undergarments and sleepwear.
Steger testified that he delayed sending a specific warning to avoid a panic and to allow the university to notify the victims' parents. He said the advice to delay a specific warning came from a member of his Policy Group who has since died.
The Prydes and the Petersons were the only eligible families who didn't accept their share of a previous settlement with the state worth $11 million.
Hall said that the only way a cap on Wednesday's jury award could be lifted would be action by the attorney general or the state Legislature. Still, both sides are submitting briefs for the court to consider.
A state panel that investigated the shootings concluded that officials erred in not sending an alert earlier. The lag in issuing a campus warning also brought Virginia Tech a $55,000 fine from the U.S. Education Department. The school is appealing.
http://www2.journalnow.com/news/2012/mar/14/jury-finds-va-tech-negligent-07-shootings-ar-2043745/?sc_cid=WSJ-NEWS-PMDlyNews
Search This Blog
Showing posts with label campus crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label campus crime. Show all posts
Monday, March 19, 2012
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Stories that you just will not believe!
First, I get to campus this morning and this is the message with which I am greeted:
Campus Crime Alert
ASSAULT
ASSAULT
On Tuesday January 24, 2012 at approximately 8:46 PM, two female students reported to the ASU Police Department that they had been physically assaulted by the same known male acquaintance within the past week.
For more information: http://www.police.appstate.edu/assault
_______________________
My response? So arrest the guy! Then if he is convicted, tell us all about him. Until then, why are you bothering me with it? I mean, you're not telling us his name or anything so that we can protect ourselves if we see him.
_______________________
Second, there is this, which leaves me breathless:
A convicted murderer on death row in North Carolina wrote a taunting letter to his hometown newspaper about his life of "leisure" in prison and making a mockery of the legal system.
Danny Robbie Hembree Jr. was found guilty of murdering 17-year-old Heather Catterton in 2009 and was sentenced to death on Nov. 18, 2011.
Hembree, 50, is on death row at Central Prison in Raleigh, N.C., but he's not looking for any pity in the letter he sent to The Gaston Gazette.
"Is the public aware that I am a gentleman of leisure, watching color TV in the A.C., reading, taking naps at will, eating three well balanced hot meals a day," Hembree asked in the letter. "I'm housed in a building that connects to the new 55 million dollar hospital with round the clock free medical care 24/7."
He also asks if the public knows that the chances of his "lawful murder" taking place in the next 20 years, if ever, are "very slim."
His words:
"I am a man who is ready to except [sic] his unjustful punishment and face God almighty with a clean conscience unlike you cowards and your cowardly system," Hembree wrote. "Kill me if you can suckers. Ha! Ha! Ha!"
http://abcnews.go.com/US/death-row-inmate-writes-taunting-letter-life-leisure/story?id=15438651#.TyFqFdS-bz8
_______________________
This above story is NATIONAL news out of my state. And predictably, supporters of the death penalty are calling for his execution and saying, "See, told you we need the death penalty!"
My response, then kill him. But then again, do we really let people like this decide for us how we will behave? Do you let killers decide our fate?
The fact is that this guy is sadly right. The death penalty is a joke. And he will likely live on death row forever. So why have it in the first place? Study after study after study in our state shows it is not a workable punishment. It is not good policy.
_______________________
And third, there is this! About our failing drug war.
After 40 years of defeat and failure, America's "war on drugs" is being buried in the same fashion as it was born – amid bloodshed, confusion, corruption and scandal. US agents are being pulled from South America; Washington is putting its narcotics policy under review, and a newly confident region is no longer prepared to swallow its fatal Prohibition error. Indeed, after the expenditure of billions of dollars and the violent deaths of tens of thousands of people, a suitable epitaph for America's longest "war" may well be the plan, in Bolivia, for every family to be given the right to grow coca in its own backyard.
The "war", declared unilaterally throughout the world by Richard Nixon in 1969, is expiring as its strategists start discarding plans that have proved futile over four decades: they are preparing to withdraw their agents from narcotics battlefields from Colombia to Afghanistan and beginning to coach them in the art of trumpeting victory and melting away into anonymous defeat. Not surprisingly, the new strategy is being gingerly aired in the media of the US establishment, from The Wall Street Journal to the Miami Herald.
Prospects in the new decade are thus opening up for vast amounts of useless government expenditure being reassigned to the treatment of addicts instead of their capture and imprisonment. And, no less important, the ever-expanding balloon of corruption that the "war" has brought to heads of government, armies and police forces wherever it has been waged may slowly start to deflate.
Prepare to shed a tear over the loss of revenue that eventual decriminalisation of narcotics could bring to the traffickers, large and small, and to the contractors who have been making good money building and running the new prisons that help to bankrupt governments – in the US in particular, where drug offenders – principally small retailers and seldom the rich and important wholesalers – have helped to push the prison population to 1,600,000; their imprisonment is already straining federal and state budgets. In Mississippi, where drug offenders once had to serve 85 per cent of their sentences, they are now being required to serve less than a quarter. California has been ordered to release 40,000 inmates because its prisons are hugely overcrowded.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-waves-white-flag-in-disastrous-war-on-drugs-1870218.html
_______________________
That is, this story is being ignored in the US press. And why is that?
Danny Robbie Hembree Jr. was found guilty of murdering 17-year-old Heather Catterton in 2009 and was sentenced to death on Nov. 18, 2011.
Hembree, 50, is on death row at Central Prison in Raleigh, N.C., but he's not looking for any pity in the letter he sent to The Gaston Gazette.
"Is the public aware that I am a gentleman of leisure, watching color TV in the A.C., reading, taking naps at will, eating three well balanced hot meals a day," Hembree asked in the letter. "I'm housed in a building that connects to the new 55 million dollar hospital with round the clock free medical care 24/7."
He also asks if the public knows that the chances of his "lawful murder" taking place in the next 20 years, if ever, are "very slim."
His words:
"I am a man who is ready to except [sic] his unjustful punishment and face God almighty with a clean conscience unlike you cowards and your cowardly system," Hembree wrote. "Kill me if you can suckers. Ha! Ha! Ha!"
http://abcnews.go.com/US/death-row-inmate-writes-taunting-letter-life-leisure/story?id=15438651#.TyFqFdS-bz8
_______________________
This above story is NATIONAL news out of my state. And predictably, supporters of the death penalty are calling for his execution and saying, "See, told you we need the death penalty!"
My response, then kill him. But then again, do we really let people like this decide for us how we will behave? Do you let killers decide our fate?
The fact is that this guy is sadly right. The death penalty is a joke. And he will likely live on death row forever. So why have it in the first place? Study after study after study in our state shows it is not a workable punishment. It is not good policy.
_______________________
And third, there is this! About our failing drug war.
After 40 years of defeat and failure, America's "war on drugs" is being buried in the same fashion as it was born – amid bloodshed, confusion, corruption and scandal. US agents are being pulled from South America; Washington is putting its narcotics policy under review, and a newly confident region is no longer prepared to swallow its fatal Prohibition error. Indeed, after the expenditure of billions of dollars and the violent deaths of tens of thousands of people, a suitable epitaph for America's longest "war" may well be the plan, in Bolivia, for every family to be given the right to grow coca in its own backyard.
The "war", declared unilaterally throughout the world by Richard Nixon in 1969, is expiring as its strategists start discarding plans that have proved futile over four decades: they are preparing to withdraw their agents from narcotics battlefields from Colombia to Afghanistan and beginning to coach them in the art of trumpeting victory and melting away into anonymous defeat. Not surprisingly, the new strategy is being gingerly aired in the media of the US establishment, from The Wall Street Journal to the Miami Herald.
Prospects in the new decade are thus opening up for vast amounts of useless government expenditure being reassigned to the treatment of addicts instead of their capture and imprisonment. And, no less important, the ever-expanding balloon of corruption that the "war" has brought to heads of government, armies and police forces wherever it has been waged may slowly start to deflate.
Prepare to shed a tear over the loss of revenue that eventual decriminalisation of narcotics could bring to the traffickers, large and small, and to the contractors who have been making good money building and running the new prisons that help to bankrupt governments – in the US in particular, where drug offenders – principally small retailers and seldom the rich and important wholesalers – have helped to push the prison population to 1,600,000; their imprisonment is already straining federal and state budgets. In Mississippi, where drug offenders once had to serve 85 per cent of their sentences, they are now being required to serve less than a quarter. California has been ordered to release 40,000 inmates because its prisons are hugely overcrowded.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-waves-white-flag-in-disastrous-war-on-drugs-1870218.html
_______________________
That is, this story is being ignored in the US press. And why is that?
Friday, February 4, 2011
Doesn't any student journalist ever take one of my classes?
This headline in the online version of the campus paper today:
2010 Statistics Show Increase in Campus Crime
Along with this image.
But what do these data really show?
Two separate things:
1) The purple and blue bars show crimes known to the police.
2) The green and orange bars show arrests.
Neither of these is a valid indicator of actual crime.
For example, police may find out about more crime but this does not mean crime is actually up. Perhaps it means police are doing a better job discovering it, or that students are more likely to report it. The point is that it is NOT appropriate to draw conclusions about crime trends from these data, yet this kind of story appears in the paper every single year.
(And never mind the fact that even these data do not show that crimes known to the police are up -- theft is up, but fraud is down, so it's a wash. That means even the headline is inaccurate. And the headline in the print version of the paper is "Lots of Larceny," which is at least factually true).
As for the arrest data, these show that arrests for alcohol and illicit drugs are actually down since last year.
Yet, these data also tell us little about actual drug use on campus. The vast majority of drug use is unknown to police and there is a wide divergence in these data every year because in some years there are more complaints than others and in some years police simply discover more violations than in others.
If only someone was teaching about how the media cover crime and criminal justice, maybe we would not have to be confronted with these stories every year. Or maybe if someone wrote a book about it?!?!?!
http://www.theappalachianonline.com/campus/7004-2010-statistics-show-increase-in-campus-crime
2010 Statistics Show Increase in Campus Crime
Along with this image.
But what do these data really show?
Two separate things:
1) The purple and blue bars show crimes known to the police.
2) The green and orange bars show arrests.
Neither of these is a valid indicator of actual crime.
For example, police may find out about more crime but this does not mean crime is actually up. Perhaps it means police are doing a better job discovering it, or that students are more likely to report it. The point is that it is NOT appropriate to draw conclusions about crime trends from these data, yet this kind of story appears in the paper every single year.
(And never mind the fact that even these data do not show that crimes known to the police are up -- theft is up, but fraud is down, so it's a wash. That means even the headline is inaccurate. And the headline in the print version of the paper is "Lots of Larceny," which is at least factually true).
As for the arrest data, these show that arrests for alcohol and illicit drugs are actually down since last year.
Yet, these data also tell us little about actual drug use on campus. The vast majority of drug use is unknown to police and there is a wide divergence in these data every year because in some years there are more complaints than others and in some years police simply discover more violations than in others.
If only someone was teaching about how the media cover crime and criminal justice, maybe we would not have to be confronted with these stories every year. Or maybe if someone wrote a book about it?!?!?!
http://www.theappalachianonline.com/campus/7004-2010-statistics-show-increase-in-campus-crime
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)