Search This Blog

Showing posts with label war on drugs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war on drugs. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

War on drugs still in the news ...

both in the US and around the world!

Start with this, from the Dallas Morning News:

In the war on drugs, a dismal record and a legacy of unfairness

Kansas City Star-16 hours ago
But the “war on drugs” didn't hurt drugs at all: Usage rose by 2,800 percent — that's not a typo — in the 40 years after it began in 1971.
Leonard Pitts Jr.: Time to cease the 'War on Drugs'
Poughkeepsie Journal-Apr 27, 2014

This is from the article: As journalist Matt Taibbi observes in his new book “The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap,” Holder’s Justice Department has declined, essentially as a matter of policy, to prosecute the bankers who committed fraud, laundered money for drug cartels and terrorists, stole billions from their own banks, left taxpayers holding the bag, and also — not incidentally — nearly wrecked the U.S. economy. But let some nobody get caught with a joint in his pocket during a stop-and-frisk and the full weight of American justice falls on him.

And then there is this:

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2014/04/28/4988031/in-the-war-on-drugs-a-dismal-record.html#storylink=cpy
 

David Cameron told it's time to surrender war on drugs, by Tory ...

Daily Mail-5 hours ago
David Cameron has been urged to abandon the 'futile' war on drugs by a group of Conservative party modernisers who think reform would ...
 
And this!
 

Australia losing its war on drugs

ABC Online-4 hours ago
MARK COLVIN: The Australian Crime Commission's annual drugs report warns that the use of meth - or ice - is emerging as a pandemic.
Australia warned its ice problem is reaching pandemic proportions
-Herald Sun-14 hours ago
 
 
 
 
 


Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Innocent people in prison? I'm shocked!

CNN today actually has a lead story worth reading.
 
It is about wrongful conviction, an understudied issue in criminal justice.

They said he killed his wife, but he was innocent

Watch this video

Michael Morton's amazing journey

Jurors didn't believe Michael Morton when he said he didn't kill his wife. By the time DNA tests proved his innocence, Morton had lost 25 years in prison. FULL STORY

Be sure to read the story linked above about why America imprisons so many; it is about the imbalance in courts where the prosecutor has all the power, the war on drugs, and how this leads to more incarceration.






Tuesday, November 12, 2013

From Truthout.com:

"The criminal justice system spends billions of dollars and significant resources prosecuting and imprisoning people in the War on Drugs. With less than half of all violent crimes being solved, isn't it time to rethink our priorities?"

Priorities.

This is what I always talk to my students about.

I propose ideas to reduce or prevent crime. They always ask, "How do we pay for it."

I say, "We already have the money now. It's just that we are spending it on something else."

So it's about priorities.

As in, what's really important?

This short video from upworthy.com illustrates what is wrong with our priorities in criminal justice.

Watch it and try to understand how the war on drugs interferes with our ability to solve other problems. We think spending money arresting drug dealers is more of a priority than solving violent crimes.

It's all about priorities.




 

Friday, December 14, 2012

Crystal clear proof how screwed up criminal justice is

Casa Grande invited a private prison firm to help make a high-school marijuana bust. Can you spot the conflict of interest? If not, there is something wrong with your brain!

On 31 October 2012, a group of local law enforcement agencies and approximately 20 trained sniffer dogs descended on the Vista Grande High School in Arizona to perform a drug sweep. The officers and dogs showed up in the early morning and the school was put on lockdown, meaning all of the doors were locked and none of the children was allowed to leave.

According to the school's principal, Tim Hamilton, the dogs did not go near the children, who were made to wait in the hallways for the hour or so that the officers and canines swept through their classrooms. Ultimately, the dogs sniffed out three personal stashes of marijuana, and the three kids who owned these stashes were taken away by the police. Two of the kids have been put on long-term suspension, one has been expelled and all three are facing criminal charges.

Drug sweeps of schools are not uncommon occurrences in the recent past in America, much to the chagrin of civil rights advocates, who see such sweeps as an efficient means of diverting certain kids to prison – in some cases, even before they make it to adolescence, via the much-criticized "school-to-prison pipeline". What was unusual about this particular raid, however, is that, among the team of law enforcement personnel and canines put together by the local Casa Grande police department, there were prison guards employed by the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), the country's largest for-profit prison company, which owns and operates several prisons in the area. CCA was also kind enough to provide their sniffer dogs for the raid.

What's even more unusual about this is that pretty much nobody in a position of authority in and around Casa Grande seems to think there's anything wrong with that.

"To invite for profit prison guards to conduct law enforcement actions in a high school is perhaps the most direct expression of the 'schools-to-prison pipeline' I have ever seen," says Caroline Isaacs of the American Friends Service Committee. Aside from the fact that CCA is a private corporation whose driving goal is to fill more prison beds because that is how it generates revenue for its shareholders, prison guards are neither qualified, nor legally entitled, to take part in law enforcement activities. According the Arizona's administrative code, any individual engaging in the duties of a "peace officer" must obtain certification from the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training (Post). Prison guards are not Post-certified by default, because they are not obliged to undertake the necessary training (since it's not their job to go about making arrests).

To make matters worse, CCA's private prison guards are not even Post-certified as correctional officers because they are exempt from the Arizona state standards and training requirements. Despite this, Post's executive director, Lyle Mann, could see no problem with CCA sending its guards and sniffer dogs into the high school. As far as he could see, CCA was just behaving as the good corporate citizen he believes it to be (a view shared by many in Arizona) by helping out its neighbors. This is how Mann explained this view to me:
"CCA is one of the largest employers in the area. They employ more people than anyone I know in the state in that area. They try hard to be a good corporate citizen. They give money to charity, sponsor leukemia runs and other things good corporate citizens should do. So this government entity [the school] asked this good corporate citizen to loan them their tools [the dogs and the prisons guards], which they did, free of charge. The dogs are trained to take part in law enforcement activities; whoever handles the dogs is immaterial. So, although it is correct that those guards are not certified to carry out law enforcement actions, what they did at the school did not really require Post certification. They were just doing what a good corporate citizen should do."
Officer Thomas Anderson, spokesperson for the Casa Grande police department shared the view that it was the dogs' qualification and not the guards who handled them that counted, so there was no issue in his eyes with the prison guards being present at the raid. He also indicated that this was not the only time they have used CCA guards and dogs in local law enforcement operations, but he refused to elaborate.

CCA did not respond to queries regarding how frequently they donate the use of their dogs and guards to local law enforcement efforts, or whether they do, in fact, donate those services free of charge.

In response to CCA's efforts on 31 October 2012 to be a good corporate citizen by sending its sniffer dogs into the local high school, three school kids are now facing drug charges, two for possession of marijuana and one for possession of marijuana with intent to sell. Principal Hamilton believes that two of the kids will probably be sentenced to probation; the other may do jail time.

"In other states, they're legalizing marijuana," says Alex Friedmann, editor of Prison Legal News. "In Arizona, kids are being kicked out of school for possession." While it is, of course, important to keep drugs out of school, surely counseling and intervention would be more appropriate measures than funneling children into prisons and landing them with criminal records.

Sadly, in Casa Grande, the grownups charged with care of these kids care appear to be more concerned about the well-being of CCA, the for-profit prison company and "good corporate citizen", than they are for the children who may end filling CCA's lucrative prison beds.

Major props to the Guardian for sharing this news!

https://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/commentisfree/2012/dec/13/arizona-business-cca-school-to-prison-pipeline


Sunday, October 14, 2012

New movie questions war on drugs

... one of its main proponents is actor Brad Pitt.

The documentary claims the war on drugs has cost more than $1 trillion, has accounted for over 45 million arrests since 1971, and that it preys largely on poor and minority communities.
 
According to Pitt: "I know people are suffering because of it. I know I've lived a very privileged life in comparison and I can't stand for it. ... It's such bad strategy. It makes no sense. It perpetuates itself. You make a bust, you drive up profit, which makes more people want to get into it. To me, there's no question; we have to rethink this policy and we have to rethink it now."
 
Yeah, you think? My own analysis shows the war to fail to meet its goals (consistently) and to impose fr more costs on society than benefits. So, it is a failing policy.
 
It's nice that a documentary company is calling attention to it, and that the New York Times is as well.

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/10/13/arts/13reuters-houseilivein-bradpitt.html?_r=0

Monday, August 27, 2012

Who covers the war on drugs?

I was going to blog today about the story in New York City where the police shot 9 unarmed people in their effort to shoot and kill one armed man. The New York Times even ran it as a front page story, featuring a version of this shocking photo on their paper's first page:



There is so much here to discuss, touching upon many issues in the book.

But then I got a call today from the Huffington Post, and they are devoting coverage to the Republican National Convention starting tomorrow. One angle they are taking is policies that Republicans are not talking about (the "Shadow Convention" or something like that).

One of those policies is the drug war.

And guess who is being interviewed LIVE (web interview of course) alongside others including Mr. Michael Steele (former RNC Chairman)??? Yep, me!

Wow, live at 12:30pm tomorrow on http://live.huffingtonpost.com/

So tune in and you'll hear some serious people discussing a serious issue that is NOT being covered by most mainstream media outlets!



Thursday, January 26, 2012

Stories that you just will not believe!

First, I get to campus this morning and this is the message with which I am greeted:

Campus Crime Alert
ASSAULT
On Tuesday January 24, 2012 at approximately 8:46 PM, two female students reported to the ASU Police Department that they had been physically assaulted by the same known male acquaintance within the past week.
 
 
_______________________
 
My response? So arrest the guy! Then if he is convicted, tell us all about him. Until then, why are you bothering me with it? I mean, you're not telling us his name or anything so that we can protect ourselves if we see him. 

_______________________
 
Second, there is this, which leaves me breathless:
A convicted murderer on death row in North Carolina wrote a taunting letter to his hometown newspaper about his life of "leisure" in prison and making a mockery of the legal system.
Danny Robbie Hembree Jr. was found guilty of murdering 17-year-old Heather Catterton in 2009 and was sentenced to death on Nov. 18, 2011.

Hembree, 50, is on death row at Central Prison in Raleigh, N.C., but he's not looking for any pity in the letter he sent to The Gaston Gazette.

"Is the public aware that I am a gentleman of leisure, watching color TV in the A.C., reading, taking naps at will, eating three well balanced hot meals a day," Hembree asked in the letter. "I'm housed in a building that connects to the new 55 million dollar hospital with round the clock free medical care 24/7."

He also asks if the public knows that the chances of his "lawful murder" taking place in the next 20 years, if ever, are "very slim."

His words:

"I am a man who is ready to except [sic] his unjustful punishment and face God almighty with a clean conscience unlike you cowards and your cowardly system," Hembree wrote. "Kill me if you can suckers. Ha! Ha! Ha!"

http://abcnews.go.com/US/death-row-inmate-writes-taunting-letter-life-leisure/story?id=15438651#.TyFqFdS-bz8
_______________________

This above story is NATIONAL news out of my state. And predictably, supporters of the death penalty are calling for his execution and saying, "See, told you we need the death penalty!"

My response, then kill him. But then again, do we really let people like this decide for us how we will behave? Do you let killers decide our fate?

The fact is that this guy is sadly right. The death penalty is a joke. And he will likely live on death row forever. So why have it in the first place? Study after study after study in our state shows it is not a workable punishment. It is not good policy.
_______________________

And third, there is this! About our failing drug war.


After 40 years of defeat and failure, America's "war on drugs" is being buried in the same fashion as it was born – amid bloodshed, confusion, corruption and scandal. US agents are being pulled from South America; Washington is putting its narcotics policy under review, and a newly confident region is no longer prepared to swallow its fatal Prohibition error. Indeed, after the expenditure of billions of dollars and the violent deaths of tens of thousands of people, a suitable epitaph for America's longest "war" may well be the plan, in Bolivia, for every family to be given the right to grow coca in its own backyard.


The "war", declared unilaterally throughout the world by Richard Nixon in 1969, is expiring as its strategists start discarding plans that have proved futile over four decades: they are preparing to withdraw their agents from narcotics battlefields from Colombia to Afghanistan and beginning to coach them in the art of trumpeting victory and melting away into anonymous defeat. Not surprisingly, the new strategy is being gingerly aired in the media of the US establishment, from The Wall Street Journal to the Miami Herald.

Prospects in the new decade are thus opening up for vast amounts of useless government expenditure being reassigned to the treatment of addicts instead of their capture and imprisonment. And, no less important, the ever-expanding balloon of corruption that the "war" has brought to heads of government, armies and police forces wherever it has been waged may slowly start to deflate.

Prepare to shed a tear over the loss of revenue that eventual decriminalisation of narcotics could bring to the traffickers, large and small, and to the contractors who have been making good money building and running the new prisons that help to bankrupt governments – in the US in particular, where drug offenders – principally small retailers and seldom the rich and important wholesalers – have helped to push the prison population to 1,600,000; their imprisonment is already straining federal and state budgets. In Mississippi, where drug offenders once had to serve 85 per cent of their sentences, they are now being required to serve less than a quarter. California has been ordered to release 40,000 inmates because its prisons are hugely overcrowded.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-waves-white-flag-in-disastrous-war-on-drugs-1870218.html

 _______________________


That is, this story is being ignored in the US press. And why is that?









Thursday, December 22, 2011

So the drug war works then?

As the FBI released its national crime statistics for the first half of 2011 on Monday, showing violent crime and property crime down across the board, a group of anthropologists at City University of New York floated a theory for the ongoing crime reduction in New York that they extrapolated nationally: Crime is falling because drugs are getting cheaper. In short, the thinking goes that most crime is drug-related in general, usually committed by users to pay for their fix. So if drugs are cheaper, users will commit fewer crimes to buy them.

http://news.yahoo.com/reagans-war-drugs-reduced-crime-unexpected-way-134745710.html

The problem, of course, is that one of the goals of the drug war is to RAISE prices of drugs, thereby making them harder to afford, so that--in the words of the Office of National Drug Control Policy--people who are using drugs will stop using them and those not using them will be less likely to start using drugs in the first place!

This article makes Ronald Reagan, who stepped up the war on drugs in 1980s, seem like a genius. Step up a policy that will fail to achieve its goals but will reduce crime anyway!

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Imagine if we tried to solve obesity with a "a war on corn"

Truthout does it again.

Imagine if our leaders, faced with the fact that two-thirds of us are overweight or obese, declared a war on corn. After all, that is from where we get our chips and sweeteners.

It's be sort of like fighting a war on drugs to solve a drug abuse problem.

Here is a brilliant analogy for the war on drugs: http://truthout.org/war-drugs-success-means-failure

And there is more discussion on drug policy there as well.

Friday, January 28, 2011

"The Year of Meth"

Moral panics about drugs are very common in the news.

We've had them about marijuana, crack cocaine, and now meth.

Even in the local news.


The High Country Press currently features a front-page story on meth, asking if 2011 is "The Year of Meth?"

Well, of course, no one can say for sure what 2011 holds, since it just started.

But the data in their own story show that even 2010 could not rationally be called "The Year of Meth."


For example, in this chart, to the right, we see that meth lab busts increased in 2010, but they still remain far below the levels of 2003 and 2004.

Any student of research methods or statistics could tell you that, overall, meth lab busts are down.

Yet, the High Country Press claims in the article that meth labs are again "rising."

Their source of data? Law enforcement, of course. Take, for example, this claim: "Law enforcement officials say that methamphetamine manufacture, after a period of decline in 2006 and 2007, is once again on the rise locally and throughout North Carolina."

In fact, the charts in the story depict the activities of law enforcement, and thus reflect the fact that seizures of meth labs have increased. For example, the chart to the right shows that meth lab seizures increased from 2007 through 2010. They do not conclusively show that actual meth labs increased during this time period.

Yet, even if there really is more meth being produced, the 2010 level if still below that of 2004 and 2005. So why all the hype?

Even the statewide data depicted in the story show a total of only 235 labs seized in the entire state in 2010. With more than 3 million households in the state, 235 labs amounts to approximately 0.008% of all households. In other words, this is hardly a problem serious enough to warrant such concern.

Nevertheless, the High Country Press depicts a map showing the distribution of meth labs in the state. See all that white? Those are counties with ZERO lab busts.






And who led the state?

My county--Watauga County--with a grand total of 20 busts! That's 20 busts in a county with tens of thousands of residences. 

Johnson County, Tennessee--to our Northwest--reportedly had "around 20 meth labs" discovered both in 2009 and in 2010. 

Johnson County Sheriff Mike Reece is quoted in the story saying: “It’s on the rise again. We’re getting word every day that they’re everywhere.”
Read that again.

Every day?

Everywhere?

Clearly this is a gross exaggeration as, again, tens of thousands of households in the county do not house meth labs. How can they be everywhere when they are virtually nowhere?

Yet, the reporter for the newspaper does not attempt to refute the statement, much less temper it with data or an alternative viewpoint from people who actually study these problems for a living.

Does this matter?

Yes.

Evidence reviewed in the book shows that when the media focus on an issue, it becomes seen as a social problem. In other words, media coverage about meth creates concern about meth, creating the perception that it is a serious threat to people.

Want some anecdotal evidence? Take this comment from a person who read the story online:

"Is there a service that certifies real estate as 'meth free'? I am thinking about relocating to Boone area and am concerned esp. about renting a contaminated property."
 
See? A person actually thinks he/she has a realistic chance of renting a contaminated apartment in the county because of this story!
 
And here is another:
 
"Thank you for letting us know about the dangers of trash pick up. We do that regularly and we appreciate the warning. And, thanks to Sheriff Hagaman and all of the deputies for your service. Articles like this remind us of how dangerous your job is and how you are at risk daily to keep our community safe."
 
Now people will even be worried about picking up trash?

Wow, just wow.

http://highcountrypress.com/weekly/2011/01-27-11/2011-the-year-of.htm