Search This Blog

Showing posts with label reality TV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reality TV. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Media frenzy around a single murder

In a country with about 16,000 murders every year, how can a single murder case become the main news story for not only one year, but three years? And how can a single murder trial of a mother for allegedly killing her two-year old daughter in 2008--when hundreds of children are murdered each year--become the dominant story in 2011?

Each day thousands of media stories were generated about this case. And millions of Americans read the stories, watched the trial live, and literally soaked up as much information as they could about the case until yesterday's "shocking" (or at least disappointing) jury verdict.

The BBC made an effort to explain our fascination with the case that "gripped the US." From the article:

"It's the biggest news event to have happened in Orlando in years, says Mike Boslet, editor of Orlando monthly magazine.

"'Life is going on as usual but people are glued to it in some fashion or another. Lots of people are watching it in their lunch hours. When you're going to get your car fixed or doctors' office, the Casey Anthony trial is on. Everybody is talking about it. It's good dinner-party conversation.'"

Except this was not only true in Orlando but also all of Florida and much of the US.

The BBC asks: "So why has this case, above other child deaths, grabbed such attention?

"Given the ingredients of the case, the question is not why is it so big but why wouldn't it be so big," says Robert Thompson, professor of popular culture at Syracuse University in New York.

"'You've got this incredibly tragic story of a dead child and it doesn't get any more dramatic than that. Then the details - those mysterious [31] days, those imagined jobs and imagined friends. The pretty mother telling stories that don't seem to stack up. If you were writing it as a fictional crime story, no-one would believe it.'"

"As well as the genuine interest, there is also 'cultural equity' generated by the media coverage, he says. Once the decision is made that this story is worth investing in, then there is no going back.
 
"'It starts as a local story then the networks send satellite trucks and start spending money to build up equity of the story and it becomes like a TV show - the more details people get, the more they want. Viewers get sucked in like a soap opera.'" 

This is how local crime stories become national crime stories, just as explained in the book. 

"'It's a real-life soap opera, all the thrills you might expect to get from an episode of LA Law,' said Eric Deggans of the St. Petersburg Times. So the question might be, how come soap operas are so popular?

Robin Simon, a professor of sociology at Wake Forest University in North Carolina, adds the issue of the archetypal offender and victim:

"'A beautiful woman accused of killing her sweet child and then accused of lying and her father has to take the stand and he's accused of having an affair. The fact it's a woman on trial has heightened interest' because the allegation breaks the maternal bond society expects women to have with their children.

"'The media attention this has generated would not be as significant if it was a father murdering a child.'"

That's the "evil woman" hypothesis discussed in the text.

Finally, Simon adds: "'A journalist was interviewing people in the line waiting to get into court. One woman said 'I can't wait to see it. This is the ultimate reality show. And then she giggled. She didn't even perceive this as a real case with real people. It was sick.'"

The ultimate reality show? And why do we like those shows?

A colleague and friend suggested to me that we like the things that we know probably won't happen to us. So instead of being interested in stories about the realities of corporate health care (which does impact us), mass layoffs (which do impact us), the unfair tax system (which does impact us), and similar stories, we tune those out in favor of stories like the Casey Anthony murder trial, because it is entertaining like a soap opera or reality TV show.

And some people are so outraged by the jury verdict, as if they know better than the jury who heard the evidence (rather than the talking heads on TV) and were instructed in how to apply the actual law to the case (which requires that Anthony's guilt be proven beyond a reasonable doubt) rather than who heard the tortured opinions of people like Nancy Grace.

Well, if that did not outrage followers of the trial who were convinced that Anthony was guilty, this story by Fox News that Anthony "can earn millions from media, Hollywood" surely will.

Oh brother.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Remember when MTV used to show music?

Probably not, since it's been so long ago.

A new crop of underage moms was unveiled last week in a two-minute trailer for the upcoming season of "16 and Pregnant" -- and the previews promise more violence.

Oh joy! Nothing like a bunch of 16 year old pregnant girls fighting on TV.

Girls Gone Wild in the NEWS!

Talk about the blurring of boundaries between the news and entertainment.

Here is a story about the show, Girls Gone Wild, in the courts. The founder is being sued.

And it is in the news.

Lawyers representing “Girls Gone Wild” creator Joe Francis and attorneys for four women suing Francis were asked by a federal judge to review sexually graphic footage in the case, the News Herald reports.
Judge Richard Smoak wanted both sides to view the footage before he decides whether to show it to the jury, according to the paper.

The women, who are anonymous, have filed a federal civil lawsuit against Francis, who they allege sexually exploited them while they were underage, for allegedly filming them for his widely circulated video series “Girls Gone Wild.” The video series centered around the sexual activity of young women on spring break.

The jury in the case, which began last week in U.S. District Court in Panama City, Fla., has yet to see the footage, according to the newspaper. Lawyers for the women have argued that it is inappropriate to show the video in court.
“No matter what she’s doing on this film, it is inappropriate to show it," Rachel Pontikes, one of plaintiffs' lawyers, told Smoak Monday, the newspaper reports.

Smoak reportedly requested that lawyers representing Francis and the women review footage of Plaintiff B, filmed during spring break in 2002. The attorneys gathered Monday night to watch the footage, according to the newspaper.
Francis, who had been acting as his own attorney, was held in contempt of court last week for violating an evidentiary rule during cross-examination of a witness, Smoak ruled. On Thursday, Francis reportedly retained two 
attorneys from Panama City to represent him in the case, wmbb.com reports.

The News Herald reports that Smoak will decide Tuesday whether to show the video to the jury. Smoak said that deliberations in the case could also begin Tuesday.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Reality TV annoying?


Um, you think?

An article asking which is the most annoyning reality TV star ...

Is ALL OF THE ABOVE a possible answer?

http://tv.yahoo.com/slideshow/686/photos/1