Search This Blog

Monday, September 24, 2012

Yahoo News goes politics crazy ...

Their top stories today include:

The first story has literally no meaning and thus I don't know why it is even news. The second story shows part of the massive effort by one political party to stop people from voting, at any cost.

And more ...
 Make up your own mind on those stories.

And of course crime and violence and random, scary things are all over the news too:

Cleve Foster speaks from a visiting cage at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Polunsky Unit outside Livingston, Texas. (AP)

Texas inmate's 'spooky' death row story

Cleve Foster came within minutes of being executed only to be told he was given a reprieve. Third trip coming  

New England coach Bill Belichick crosses the line with a post-game move. (Getty Images)

NFL coach's huge no-no following loss

Bill Belichick is in hot water for what he did to a referee after a controversial last-second call. Big fine likely 

New SARS-like virus prompts urgent alert (CDC via Getty Images)

New SARS-like virus sparks concern

A man infected with a strain of virus never seen before has health officials scrambling for answers. 'A lot of holes'  

Diver attacked in dramatic underwater clash. (GrindTV.com)

Diver attacked in dramatic underwater clash

A spear fisherman has dinner in the bag until he comes face-to-face with a huge grouper. Watch the struggle

 

Friday, September 21, 2012

Even with all this important stuff going on ...

... this is still news:





Deadly new drug favored by teens: Smiles (Thinkstock)

Scary new drug favored by teens: 'Smiles'

After two teens die within 24 hours, experts are warning about the powerful hallucinogenic. Its frightening effects  

An explosive nearly went off in an Iranian soccer player's hand during a match. (YouTube)

Player tosses away debris, then it explodes

As the soccer field is being cleared following an outburst by fans, a scary moment unfolds. Watch the close call  

Britney Spears's on-air freak out ("X Factor")

Britney Spears's on-air freak out

The singer panics when a thunder storm interrupts auditions on the "X Factor." Her profanity-laced tirade  

So that is what is important. Drugs, violence, and celebrity nonsense.




Tuesday, September 18, 2012

More on bias in the news

Talking heads in the news can be principled in their criticism of or disagreement with a policy of a leader. In this case, they would be critical of or disagree with that policy no matter who the leader was, regardless of his or her political party.

OR, they can be critical of it and disagree with it only when it is pursued by someone they don't like or want to be in power. In that case, their disagreement would not be principled but instead would be partisan.

And we expect the talking heads in the news to be nonpartisan. So when we see clear evidence of them being partisan--in this case, when people say one thing during one Presidential adminstration and then contradict themselves during another Presidential adminstration--we should be shocked.

But we're not. At least when it occurs on Fox News.

Because Fox News is not news. It is partisanship in favor of one party at all times. Maybe you should tell that to your doctor, or dentist, or any other business in a public place that is broadcasting this nonsense.

And why do we have to rely on a comedian to show this to us?



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/18/jon-stewart-conservative-hypocrisy-middle-eastern-democracy-video_n_1892946.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false#sb=860952,b=facebook

Now, for those of you who do not buy it, look up who owns the network, who runs it, and to whom they give their money. Then come back and tell me how they are "fair and balanced." They report, you decide. Right.

Monday, September 17, 2012

Comparing MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News today ...

Here is the lead story on MSNBC.com today:

Romney, Obama
face challenges
in home stretch

First Read: With 50 days left before Election Day, both candidates are in a less-than-comfortable spot with debates yet to come.

Here is the lead story on CNN.com today:

After a week of GOP handwringing over his comments on anti-U.S. protests in the Muslim world, Mitt Romney is refocusing his message on the issue his advisers think will decide the election: the economy. FULL STORY

And here is the lead story on Fox News.com today:

Libyan Intelligence Challenges Obama
Account of Deadly Consulate Attack

EXCLUSIVE: Libyan intelligence source tells Fox News that contrary to Obama administration claims, there was no demonstration outside the US Consulate in Benghazi before last week's attack that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Anti-American protests, meanwhile, urged on in Lebanon by Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, above, spread Monday to more Muslim nations.
  • URGENT: US Diplomats in Beirut Destroying Classified Documents as Protests Spread
  • Tunisian Police Surround Anti-US Protest Leader Inside Mosque | Anti-American Protests Erupt in Afghanistan
  • POWER PLAY: Divide Over Cause of Libya Attack Echoes Reaction to 9/11
  • GOP Leaders: Obama's Foreign Policy Led to Mideast Attacks
  • OPINION: Obama's Chickens Coming Home to Roost | OPINION: Keeping Americans Safe Amid Mideast Violence

  • No, there is no bias in the news. That is what we'd like to believe.

    Or if there is, it is liberal bias. That is what people say they believe.

    Then explain to me the lead story on Fox News being a story critical of Obama Administration claims that is followed up by stories and an op-ed claiming that the attacks were even Obama's fault.

    Stunning.

    Friday, September 14, 2012

    So let me get this straight?

    A deranged man makes a movie, or actually a trailer for a movie--titled, The Innocence of Muslims--and puts it on YouTube, and suddenly protests occur across the Middle East and lots of people (including an American diplomat) are dead.

    And this was the plan on the man who made the movie?

    From The Guardian:

    Did an inflammatory anti-Muslim film trailer that appeared spontaneously on YouTube prompt the attack that left four US diplomats dead, including US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens? American officials have suggested that the assault was pre-planned, allegedly by of one of the Jihadist groups that emerged since the Nato-led overthrow of Libya's Gaddafi regime. So even though the deadly scene in Benghazi may not have resulted directly from the angry reaction to the Islamophobic video, the violence has helped realize the apocalyptic visions of the film's backers.

    Produced and promoted by a strange collection of rightwing Christian evangelicals and exiled Egyptian Copts, the trailer was created with the intention of both destabilizing post-Mubarak Egypt and roiling the US presidential election. As a consultant for the film named Steve Klein said: "We went into this knowing this was probably going to happen."

    Klein is reportedly an insurance salesman and Vietnam veteran from Hemet, California. On his personal Facebook page, Altar or Abolish, Klein obsesses over the Muslim Brotherhood, describing the organization as "a global network of Muslims attacking to convert the world's 6 billion people to Islam or kill them". Klein urges a violent response to the perceived threat of Islam in the United States, posting an image to his website depicting a middle-American family with a mock tank turret strapped to the roof of their car. "Can you direct us to the nearest mosque?" read a caption Klein added to the photo.

    You can watch the video here. I won't bother. Why?

    CNN's description is enough for me: "An online trailer for the movie depicts Islam as a fraudulent religion bent on getting rid of nonbelievers. Cartoonish scenes show Mohammed as a womanizer, child molester and ruthless killer." Nothing like insulting a religion's prophet to get their upset, no?

    So this appears to be the incredible story: Some right wing extremists with views similar to the man who massacred dozens of innocent people (mostly children) in Norway--who have a very negative and totally inaccurate view of Muslims around the world--made a "film" that was intended to incite violence. And it did. And people died, including Americans.

    And we're focusing on the Muslims instead of the crazy person who made the "film?"

    Then, to make matters worse, the Republican nominee for President blames the sitting Democratic President for the violence, saying he "sympathized with those who waged the attacks" and of issued "an apology for America's values."

    Only in America. Only in America.

    But at least some of the news organizations are on the story:
     
    https://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/commentisfree/2012/sep/13/egypt-libya-hollywood-film

    But of course NOT Fox News. This is their photo and headlines today:




    Notice the focus on Fox is still on how violent Muslims are?

    Clearly they are not paying attention.

    Wednesday, September 12, 2012

    In the wake of another 9/11 attack ...

    ... we might as well learn what happened before (and led to) the previous 9/11 attack.

    I've written extensively about it.

    And here is a recent interview from Kurt Eichenwald, author of 500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars.

    Some may dismiss this because the interview is with Rachel Maddow. But listen to what Eichenwald learned about the previously unrealized degree of specificity and frequency of warnings the Bush administration received about a terror attack by Osama bin Laden leading up to the attacks on 9-11.

    I dare you to watch it, here:

    http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/11490-rachel-maddow-getting-9-11-history-right

    And then if you want to know what really happened prior to 9/11 and how that impacted the likelihood of such a terrible terrorist attack, go here and have at it:

    http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

    Tuesday, September 11, 2012

    It's 9/11 again, and yet ...

    ... we still don't have all the answers from that day.

    Forget about all the ridiculous conspiracy theories about what happened that day. Stuff like bombs being placed in the World Trade Center and missiles being fired into the Pentagon and ever crazier weirder things!

    What you should think about is the how? As in, how could this have happened with all the warnings about that day, which came for years and years and years and were very very very specific?

    This was NOT a failure of imagination, as posited by the 9/11 Commission. We imagined this attack. We even prepared for it. For years.

    We just did not prevent it. And the question is why?

    I've written about it.

    So where is the news about that on this sacred and tragic day? Even all this time, and no one in the mainstream press is talking about it.

    To their credit, the New York Times editorializes about this today in "The Deafness Before the Storm." Read it. This is not a political attack on sitting president, it is an indictment of a president who failed to protect us 11 years ago today.

    If you are not outraged, you're not paying attention.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?smid=tw-share&fb_source=message&moc.semityn.www


    Monday, September 10, 2012

    Imagine if all the news organizations were like this ...

    As is pointed out in the text, news organizations such as NPR and PBS (and other nonprofits) are found to do the best job at critical coverage of the powerful, what is referred to in the text as the Fourth Estate.

    Recently, PBS featured a story on its Frontline program titled, "Top CIA Official: Obama Changed Virtually None of Bush’s Controversial Programs."

    Here is the story with a promotion of the show:

    As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama pledged “a top to bottom review of the threats we face and our abilities to confront them.” He promised a sweeping overhaul of the Bush administration’s war on terror, which he criticized for compromising American values.
    But FRONTLINE has learned from a former high-ranking CIA official that even before he took office, Obama’s team “signaled” they had no intention of rolling back secret programs begun under the Bush administration. In his first televised interview, for next Tuesday’s Top Secret America John Rizzo, a 34-year agency veteran described as “the most influential lawyer in CIA history,” tells FRONTLINE:
    I was part of the transition briefings of the incoming Obama team, and they signaled fairly early on that the incoming president believed in a vigorous, aggressive, continuing counterterrorism effort. Although they never said it exactly, it was clear that the interrogation program was going away. We all knew that.
    But his people were signaling to us, I think partly to try to assure us that they weren’t going to come in and dismantle the place, that they were going to be just as tough, if not tougher, than the Bush people.
    Rizzo, who was forced to withdraw his nomination to become CIA general counsel because of controversy over his role in developing the CIA’s secret detention and interrogation policies, also told us:
    With a notable exception of the enhanced interrogation program, the incoming Obama administration changed virtually nothing with respect to existing CIA programs and operations. Things continued. Authorities were continued that were originally granted by President Bush beginning shortly after 9/11. Those were all picked up, reviewed and endorsed by the Obama administration.
    Look for more of our exclusive interview with Rizzo, where he talks about his role in approving enhanced interrogation techniques, and creating the CIA’s secret detention system, next week. Top Secret America airs Tuesday, Sept. 6 at 9 pm (check local listings).

    So, imagine how much better of a country we' be if this type of reporting was common across all the news organizations. People would be more informed and politicians would be less likely to lie and do other devious things, even if supposedly in our collective interest.



    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/iraq-war-on-terror/topsecretamerica/top-cia-official-obama-changed-virtually-none-of-bushs-controversial-programs/

    Wednesday, September 5, 2012

    If it is a gunman, he MUST be crazy

    I heard this story coming into work this morning on NPR. It was about a shooting that occurred in Montreal, Quebec, where there is tension between Anglophones and Francophones. Yes, that's right, people who speak English (the minority) and people who speak French (the majority). Sigh.

    But anyway, here is the developing story from Yahoo News:

    "A masked gunman opened fire during a midnight victory rally for Quebec's new premier, killing one person and wounding another. The new premier, Pauline Marois of the separatist Parti Quebecois, was whisked off the stage by guards while giving her speech and uninjured.

    "It was not clear if the gunman was trying to shoot Marois, whose party favors separation for the French-speaking province from Canada. Police identified the gunman only as a 62-year-old man, and were still questioning him Wednesday morning."

    The speculation about the motive comes from things he reportedly said while being dragged away by the police. 

    http://news.yahoo.com/gunman-kills-1-rally-quebec-premier-060908664.html

    Getting back to what I heard on NPR, the reporter being interviewed from Canada speculated that the man was mentally ill or mentally unstable (this is also raised as a possible issue in the Yahoo News story). After all, what "sane" person shoots another human being?

    But since mental illness runs in my family, and since I study this for a living, I know that that most mentally ill people are not violent and thus such characterizations of the mentally ill as crazy and dangerous is inaccurate, and it angers me.

    In the book, it is shown that mental illness is often given by the media as a source of violence, even though it is not. On NPR this morning, the reporter from Canada said this shooting is likely due to mental illness, the work of a crazed gunman, because "in most shooting cases it is a crazy person who does it" (paraphrasing here).

    First of all, I am not even sure that is true. But even if it is, it is also true that "in every case it is a person with a gun who does it."

    So what is the real problem then? Mental illness or guns?



    Tuesday, September 4, 2012

    So Labor Day is about what exactly?

    This is not exactly a crime or criminal justice story, but we did just have Labor Day. And I was curious that so many of my students had no idea what the holiday was (that we had one at all) or why (what it was about).

    So I challenged to them to "google it." Learn a bit about the day, I encouraged them. Since, hey, you have the whole day off and all.

    Here is what is in the news about Labor Day:

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=labor+day&oq=labor+day&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j0j43i400.2060.6427.0.6715.19.5.5.9.12.0.33.159.5.5.0...0.0...1ac.obZKr50hxQ8

    You'll notice that mainstream news organizations such as ABC News devoted stories to the day. Here is some of what they had to say:

    Parades, picnics and politicians celebrated the American worker on Labor Day, with President Barack Obama seeking votes from Ohio union members and rivals for Senate seats marching in Massachusetts and Virginia.

    But for many, Monday's holiday was a last chance to enjoy a final summer cookout, roller coaster ride or day at the beach. Or perhaps even a stroll from Michigan's Upper Peninsula to its Lower Peninsula — along the longest suspension bridge in the Western Hemisphere.

    Politics was a big part of Labor Day, the time when much of the public usually starts to pay attention to the campaigns.

    Incredible, no? Not a word about what the day means, or even what it has to do with the political debate in the country about labor and labor rights and big business.

    This is a great example of a lack of context in the news, a major argument of the book.



    Thursday, August 30, 2012

    An example of political INJUSTICE

    Justice is typically defined as doing the right thing.

    And injustice is its opposite.

    We know justice when we see it, just as we know injustice when we see it.

    Oftentimes it is in politics where it is most clear. Like last night:

    Paul Ryan is a smart man with a very bright future. He also comes across to me as a very likeable person. But it is arrogant, ignorant, and just plain foolish to stand up in front of the American people and blame one person--President Obama--for an economic recession that was caused by policies of another President (and Congress) while simultaneously doing all he can to stand in the way of a full recovery, and to blame him for a deficit that continues to balloon due to policies that he himself (Paul Ryan) voted for! And besides that, last night he simply lied to us all several times. The least I can do is call him out on it.

    And at least the media are doing their job, too, as members of the Fourth Estate:



    www.tnr.com
    The most dishonest convention speech ever? At least five times, Ryan twisted truth beyond recognition. Here they are. 
    Even Fox News is on to him! http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/30/paul-ryans-speech-in-three-words/#ixzz252gjmvmh

    www.foxnews.com
    Paul Ryan's speech was three things: dazzling, deceiving and distracting. 
    And Yahoo News too!
    And NPR and the AP and Fact checkers all over the place! http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/08/30/160301854/fact-checkers-say-some-of-ryans-claims-dont-add-up
    www.npr.org
    On Medicare, the stimulus and a story about the GM plant in his hometown, the GO
    P vice presidential nominee got some facts wrong, according to the news outlets and nonpartisan watchdogs that parse politicians' words.


    You've perhaps heard that people are entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts. This is a great example of that.

    Wednesday, August 29, 2012

    Yes that went well!

    Wanna' know the facts of the drug war?

    Here you go:

    http://live.huffingtonpost.com/#r/segment/50351f41fe34445bac0006d8

    The news today!

    This is from Yahoo News:

    Monday, August 27, 2012

    Who covers the war on drugs?

    I was going to blog today about the story in New York City where the police shot 9 unarmed people in their effort to shoot and kill one armed man. The New York Times even ran it as a front page story, featuring a version of this shocking photo on their paper's first page:



    There is so much here to discuss, touching upon many issues in the book.

    But then I got a call today from the Huffington Post, and they are devoting coverage to the Republican National Convention starting tomorrow. One angle they are taking is policies that Republicans are not talking about (the "Shadow Convention" or something like that).

    One of those policies is the drug war.

    And guess who is being interviewed LIVE (web interview of course) alongside others including Mr. Michael Steele (former RNC Chairman)??? Yep, me!

    Wow, live at 12:30pm tomorrow on http://live.huffingtonpost.com/

    So tune in and you'll hear some serious people discussing a serious issue that is NOT being covered by most mainstream media outlets!



    Thursday, August 23, 2012

    Is this really my lovely little mountain town?

    So says the news it is:

    UPDATE: Man Injured in Watauga Shooting
    The Watauga Sheriff’s Office has identified the gunshot victim from an incident reported last night in far western Watauga County, an incident described to responding law enforcement as accidental.  The call came in at 9pm Full Story

    Watauga Commission Issues Proclamation for Fallen Deputy
    The Watauga Commissioners formerly thanked the family of Deputy William Mast Jr. for his giving of his life in service to his county—commission chair Nathan Miller, “Whereas on the morning of July 26th, 2012, deputies from the Watauga County Sheriff’s Office Full Story


    UPDATE: Man Airlifted After Found Bleeding from Neck Wound
    The man stabbed and airlifted from a landing zone set up in the middle of US 421 at the Blue Ridge Parkway overpass at about noon yesterday is still not identified, but Parkway Rangers say the man is stable today at Carolinas Medical Center. (video at: http://www.youtube.com/user/GoBlueRidgeNews ) Full Story

    Ashe Meth House Busted; Two Children Inside
    A meth lab—and children exposed to the dangerous chemicals—that’s what Narcotics Detectives of the Ashe County Sheriff’s Office, assisted by Jefferson Police Department, discovered early this morning.  The discovery led to the arrest of Full Story

    Arrest Made in Meat Camp Stabbing
    The Watauga Sheriff’s Office released the name of the woman charged and the man stabbed in an incident early last Thursday morning in Meat Camp. Wendy Melissa Miller, 38, was originally held without bond after being charged Full Story

    Crimestoppers, Avery SO Nab SuspectsCrimestoppers helped find another man wanted in a number of area counties. July 28th Avery County Sheriff’s Officers received information about the location of twenty one year old Calvin Cook.  Officers relayed the information Full Story
     
    UPDATE: 108 Arrests, 258 Charges at Gnarnia FestThe North Carolina Alcohol Law Enforcement office out of Conover released information about arrests made over the weekend at the Gnarnia Festival in Beech Mountain. A total of 108 individuals face 258 charges, including cocaine,
    Full Story


    Crimestoppers Seeks Two Suspects
    Crimestoppers is helping the Avery Sheriff’s Office in looking for two suspects. Forty two year old Douglas Ray Turbyfill is wanted in Guilford and Avery County on outstanding warrants, and also has outstanding charges in Carter County Tennessee. Full Story

     See, nothing good ever happens here, or at least so says the news.

    Wednesday, August 22, 2012

    Another "bad cop" caught on camera

    ... his own camera, his own dashboard camera!


    I find this ironic, for I am just finishing up a paper on media coverage of policing.

    The literature is clear that the great bulk of images of police in the media are actually positive in nature. This is because the police maintain close relationships with the media to help control how they are depicted, also using press releases and press conferences, careful training and so on to help portray the "good side" of police officers and policing.

    But obviously, negativity also sells in the media. So stories like this showing excessive use of force against a civilian tend to get a lot of press.

    When you read the story and see other stories like this in the future, keep in mind how difficult of a job these people have, and how little they get paid to do it. This is not to justify such outrageous behavior, because clearly it is not justifiable. But for those of us who want to understand why it happens, it is not really that hard when you sit down and think about it.

    Police officers see the ugly side of humanity every day. They deal with the crud of the Earth every day. And they are paid very little, respected very little, and often treated horribly by citizens who the officers are usually trying to help.

    When they are doing all this, officers are expected not to take things personally. See?

    But sometimes they do. And this is a clear case of that.

    The good news is excessive use of force is actually very very rare. And the number one complaint for excessive use of force is simply that an officer touched someone when he or she did not need to ("He put his hand on me!"). So let's not lose that important real piece of information when we see such stories.



    Tuesday, August 21, 2012

    Right here is why need independent media

    Every day, while checking on and reading from the mainstream news, I do my best to see what non-profit, consumer driven news organizations are talking about.

    Here is a great example of why these organizations are so important. In the book, the issues of who writes the law and who the law serves are examined. The main argument is that the mainstream media rarely raise these issues because they are vested in the same status quo as lawmakers.

    In the article, the authors show how one area of big business controls the law to its own advantage. This is not a controversial claim that powerful interests impact the law through their donations. After all, we as humans are not into throwing away our money for nothing.
    So consider this, from the article:
    How much is democracy worth to you?
    If you’re like most people, it’s priceless. But for the hedge funds and insurance companies on Wall Street, it does have a price tag. And now, thanks to a new report by Global Exchange, we know the number on it: approximately $4.2 billion. That’s how much the Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate (F.I.R.E.) sector has invested in political influence through campaign contributions and lobbying since 2006. That comes to $1,331 a minute spent on political power.

    The new report is called “Meet the F.I.R.E. Sector: How Wall Street Is Burning Democracy.” It was developed by Elect Democracy, a nonpartisan effort by Global Exchange to expose and challenge the impact of corporate money in U.S. politics. The report contains extensive research tracking Wall Street’s investment in political power, and analyzes exactly how Wall Street has secured what Global Exchange calls “industry-loyal voting practices” in Congress: by shoveling stacks of campaign cash in the direction of Congressional hopefuls from both major political parties.
    That money lets these industries get what they want in Washington. The F.I.R.E. sector contributed $879 million to members of Congress since 2006, and took positions on 383 bills during the 112th Congress. For instance, they supported Free Trade Agreements with Korea, Panama, and Colombia in 2007, and backed the bailout in 2008. Bills they opposed include the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, the Limited Homeowner and Investor Loss in Foreclosure Act of 2010, and the Stop Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2011.

    Got it? They give lots of money. They get laws that benefit them.
    And you can make a call, send an email or fax, sign a petition, and vote. Of course you can also give a sizeable amount of money to political parties or candidates, but if you're like moer than 99% of Americans, you don't.


    Monday, August 20, 2012

    Lose a finger, lose ...

    ... the ability to blog for a bit.

    It's been a rough couple of weeks as I lost a finger mowing the grass (don't ask).

    But at least I have not lost my mind. Like this guy. Wow.







    Friday, August 10, 2012

    I saw this once. It actually happens.

    We were driving on the Interstate, probably about 70 miles per hour, in the right lane of traffic. Alongside us on the left side of the car a young woman flew by us. In the short amount of time we had to see her as she sped past, this is what we saw:

    * a young woman
    * driving way too fast
    * with a young baby in the front, passenger seat of the car (presumably there is an airbag and whether there is or there isn't, the baby is supposed to be in the backseat!)
    * the baby was facing forward instead of backward (major mistake since a baby's head can literally fly right off in a high speed crash)
    ....

    AND
    ....

    * while driving, the young mother was pouring a can of Coke into the baby's bottle. Yes, Coke.

    Should anything of this be a crime?

    We make behaviors "crimes" because we think they are wrong and/or harmful to other, innocent people.

    Does anything above thus make these behaviors worthy of being "crimes?"

    Before you answer, consider this story from Salon:

    http://www.salon.com/2012/08/10/dont_put_mountain_dew_in_a_baby_bottle/


    Turns out lots of people do this sort of thing. And it's not just because they are uninformed about children's health.

    It's also because they are poor and don't have access to quality health care, including routine dental care.

    Still think it should be a crime? Or what else can we do about it?



    Thursday, August 9, 2012

    "Run, Hide, Fight"

    "If you ever find yourself in the middle of an active shooter event ..."

    So begins a video that offers advice about what you should do if find yourself at school, work, or any public place when someone starts shooting it up.

    The advice boils down to this.

    Have a plan. A simple plan.

    And the plan is:

    Run.

    Hide.

    Fight.

    So let me get this straight, we are being advised to have a plan (which means in advance of a shooting) and that plan is to follow what comes naturally to us as humans due to our autonomic nervous system (ANS)? The ANS controls the fight, flight, or freeze response that emerges when we face a stressful situation.

    Here it is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VcSwejU2D0&feature=em-share_video_user

    Know what is amazing about this video?

    You paid for it with your taxes through the US Department of Homeland Security.

    So, now you can feel prepared to deal with a random shooting incident. But not the things that are actually likely to kill you.

    Tuesday, August 7, 2012

    What exactly can be done about a "crazy" person with a gun?

    In the past month, "crazy" people with guns have gone on shooting sprees, killing multiple people in each incident.

    First was the movie theater shooting in Colorado that killed 12 people.

    Then there was the massacre at the Sikh religious facility in Wisconsin that left seven dead.

    In fact, in the past 30 years there have been at least 58 cases of mass murder with guns in the US. To be included in this list the event must meet these criteria:

    • The killings were carried out by a lone shooter. (Except in the case of the Columbine massacre and the Westside Middle School killings, both of which involved two shooters.)
    • The shootings happened during a single incident and in a public place. (Public, except in the case of a party at an apartment complex in Crandon, Wisconsin.) Crimes primarily related to armed robbery or gang activity are not included.
    • The shooter took the lives of at least four people. An FBI crime classification report identifies an individual as a mass murderer—as opposed to a spree killer or a serial killer—if he kills four or more people in a single incident (not including himself), and typically in a single location.
    • If the shooter died or was hurt from injuries sustained during the incident, he is included in the total victim count. (But we have excluded cases in which there were three fatalities and the shooter also died, per the previous criterion.)
    • We included six so-called "spree killings"—prominent cases that fit closely with our above criteria for mass murder, but in which the killings occurred in multiple locations over a short period of time.


    In the Colorado shooting, the psychiatrist who treated the shooter James Holmes actually made contact with a University of Colorado police officer to express concerns about her patient's behavior several weeks before Holmes' alleged rampage, sources told ABC News.

    The sources did not know what the officer approached by Dr. Lynne Fenton did with the information she passed along. They said, however, that the officer was recently interviewed, with an attorney present, by the Aurora Police Department as a part of the ongoing investigation of the shooting.

     Fenton would have had to have serious concerns to break confidentiality with her patient to reach out to the police officer or others, the sources said. Under Colorado law, a psychiatrist can legally breach a pledge of confidentiality with a patient if he or she becomes aware of a serious and imminent threat that their patient might cause harm to others. Psychiatrists can also breach confidentiality if a court has ordered them to do so. 

    This raises an important question. If we have evidence that a person with a serious mental illness or brain disorder is talking about or even planning such a massacre, what can actually be done about it?

    The answer is, it depends on the state. In some states, the police can take action and a person can be held against his or her will pending a mental health evaluation. In others, the person cannot be detained unless he or she is an immediate threat to himself or herself (or others) at that very moment.

    This is a tough one. We'll always look back on cases like this one (and the Sikh shooting where the shooter was known to many groups and the US government as a threat and dangerous, hate-filled person ... and the Columbine killings where the shooters were known to be in serious trouble and the plot was known to many beforehand ... and ...) and we will speculate about what could have been done.

    The news media will address the issue for weeks after every mass killing. And yet, nothing will ever be done. So get used to this happening again and again, year after year.

    Monday, August 6, 2012

    Army vet, white supremacist, domestic terrorist

    The gunman who opened fire in a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, and killed six people has been identified as Army veteran Wade Michael Page.

    Page, 40, opened fire outside the temple before entering around 10:30 a.m. Sunday morning and killed six people. He served in the Army from April 1992 through October 1998.

    Page was shot and killed in an exchange of gunfire with a police officer who sustained "eight or nine" gunshot wounds, authorities confirmed. Officials are treating it as a case of domestic terrorism.

    Though police have not given any details on the motive of the shooter, but Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms Special Agent Thomas Ahern said Page had tattoos that suggested he had ties to white supremacists.

    We've been warned about this. First, by the Southern Poverty Law Center, in fact more than once. Second, even by the US Department of Homeland Security.

    Instead of listening, we buried our heads in the sand, or even worse, raised our voices and claimed these careful reports are biased or politically motivated. I recall folks like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck alleging that now that Obama is President, he was using the US government to target his opponents by calling them terrorists. Seriously.

    But the facts are these: Angry people, oftentimes with military training and extensive firearms experience, are committing acts of violence motivated by political ends against innocent people in the United States. These people are thus rightly being called "domestic terrorists."

    One then wonders why all those efforts were directed at "left-wing" peace groups during the run-up to the war in Iraq? You know, those people baking cookies and making posters to protest the war?

    What about the "right-wing" anti-government folks that have guns and are filled with hate?

    At least the media are calling it what it is. These people are terrorists.

    And judging by at least this last shooter, they are not very smart. One assumes because this man saw people in his neighborhood wearing turbans, that he believed them to be Muslims, and thus, in his little imaginary world, they had to be a threat. In fact, they were Sikhs, who not only have no link to terrorism but also are a peace-loving people who believe strongly in equality.

    Yet, Wade Michael Page killed them anyway. And so, just weeks after the massacre at a movie theater in Colorado, the news is all over this story, too.

    http://gma.yahoo.com/sikh-temple-shooter-identified-army-vet-wade-michael-121406665--abc-news-topstories.html