This does not pertain directly to this article but I would like to mention the newest in media blowing things out of proportion(other than the swine flu epidimic) is now the 2001 anthrax scare:
If the whole purpose of abortions is to kill the unborn fetus, then I guess it is okay to be allowed to kill those performing the abortion??!! This makes no sense. If you kill someone to tell them they should not be killing someone else, how are you going to get the point across to them when they are already dead? Unborn children can't be killed ut those adults trying to kill the unborn children can?? Killing is killing. The article stated taht South Dakota has a very low rate of abortion but I guess the state is aiming for 0 abortions by trying to get this law passed. As we are discussing how laws and those that make them get covered by the media, I think it is good to see that a potential law is getting some coverage before it actually is passed. If such a law does get passed, at least some people will have some background information about it besides just finding out that there is a new law.
And a rep from Georgia says "I see your 'death to abortion doctors' and raise you 'women who miscarry'" Because we all know how exuberant women are after losing their unborn children.
Under Rep. Franklin's bill, HB 1, women who miscarry could become felons if they cannot prove that there was "no human involvement whatsoever in the causation" of their miscarriage. There is no clarification of what "human involvement" means, and this is hugely problematic as medical doctors do not know exactly what causes miscarriages.
This does not pertain directly to this article but I would like to mention the newest in media blowing things out of proportion(other than the swine flu epidimic) is now the 2001 anthrax scare:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.npr.org/2011/02/15/133775495/fbi-faulted-for-overstating-science-in-anthrax-case?sc=nd
With the title of the article being, "FBI Faulted For Overstating Science In Anthrax Case"
If the whole purpose of abortions is to kill the unborn fetus, then I guess it is okay to be allowed to kill those performing the abortion??!! This makes no sense. If you kill someone to tell them they should not be killing someone else, how are you going to get the point across to them when they are already dead? Unborn children can't be killed ut those adults trying to kill the unborn children can?? Killing is killing. The article stated taht South Dakota has a very low rate of abortion but I guess the state is aiming for 0 abortions by trying to get this law passed. As we are discussing how laws and those that make them get covered by the media, I think it is good to see that a potential law is getting some coverage before it actually is passed. If such a law does get passed, at least some people will have some background information about it besides just finding out that there is a new law.
ReplyDeleteAnd a rep from Georgia says "I see your 'death to abortion doctors' and raise you 'women who miscarry'" Because we all know how exuberant women are after losing their unborn children.
ReplyDeletehttp://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2011/02/miscarriage-death-penalty-georgia
Under Rep. Franklin's bill, HB 1, women who miscarry could become felons if they cannot prove that there was "no human involvement whatsoever in the causation" of their miscarriage. There is no clarification of what "human involvement" means, and this is hugely problematic as medical doctors do not know exactly what causes miscarriages.